← All stories
APARAGON
What’s Possible With AMP · Energy & Utilities

When Amazon Knows Before the Post Office Does

Grounded in real Aparagon platform data

Most “new movers” audiences rely on a third-party matched list. Aparagon’s doesn’t have to.

The Problem

Some conversions are more likely to happen in a narrow window tied to a real-world event. For example, most people don’t search for trash-collection service until they’re mid-move. By that time, a competitor is almost certainly showing up too. Most advertisers know to build a “new movers” audience for exactly this reason. The usual way: a third-party file matched to consumers after the fact, which means a real lag between the move and the match, and real audience lost along the way.

How AMP Finds the Moment

AMP gives an advertiser a second option: Amazon’s own new-mover life-event segments, built directly from verified account and shopping signals instead of an external file. Same trigger, same targeting idea, but sourced natively, with no match step and no lag. Instead of asking an advertiser to take that on faith, AMP lets them test it directly against their existing matched audience: same market, same budget. The difference shows up in the campaign results, not a sales pitch.

Step 1

Two Signal Sources

The same “new movers” concept, built two ways: a third-party file matched after the fact, and Amazon’s own native life-event segment.

Step 2

Head-to-Head Test

The matched third-party audience runs directly against Amazon’s native segment: same campaign parameters except for the audience.

Step 3

Compare Cost Per Result

Cost per lead and real signups are measured for each source, not just impressions delivered, to see which signal actually performs better.

One Real Example

A large regional waste-services advertiser first tested a “new movers” audience in month one, built from a third-party file of recent movers matched to Amazon identities, spending its full month-one budget across their targeted zip codes over the course of the entire month. It generated leads at $19.39 apiece, a modest return given how narrow and tightly targeted that first geography was, but a real baseline this advertiser would use to judge everything that came next.

The next month, they ran the same campaign concept again, but this time used an audience sourced directly from Amazon’s own native movers segment instead of the matched third-party file. Cost per lead dropped to $3.14, roughly six times cheaper, while still producing real leads at real volume: 319 versus 129 in the first test, with every other campaign parameter held constant.

That’s the real pitch: proof that Amazon’s own signal outperforms even a well-matched third-party list. The same life event, same targeting idea, reached in a meaningfully cheaper and more effective way.

Curious what AMP could find in your own data?

See what a closed-loop measurement setup looks like for your business.

Get Started